Monday, November 16, 2009

The Fertile Crescent


David R. Stokes explains that certain ideologies are more fertile when it comes to hate and violence, and that those who espouse such teachings need to be watched very carefully.

The thing that too many in our nation are simply ignoring is that when it comes to Islam, as opposed to any other religious idea extant, the journey from ideology to what happened at Fort Hood is also not a very long one. For any Christian to become so radicalized as to open fire people in the name of his or her religion would require a virtual repudiation of the faith. Could it happen? Sure – anything can happen. And if it did, the mainstream media in this country would have no qualms about wrapping the deed around the doctrine.

But the quantifiable fact is that such things really don't happen with Christians the way they do with Muslims. And even when certain violent acts by professed Christians, such as the killing of a doctor who has performed abortions, make the news, usually among the first and loudest expressions of condemnation and outrage are from Christians.

Does anyone hear all that many Muslim voices condemning Hasan?
"We are a nation in official and pervasive denial." &mdash David R. StokesStokes spells it out: "We are a nation in official and pervasive denial."

Yaakov "Bones" Kirschen makes a similar point about Western "Non-Believers" with his comic. He adds:
These folks are committed to not believing what is happening before their eyes. Their ability to maintain their non-belief in the Islamist war that is being waged against them is astounding!

Sunday, November 15, 2009

Satire

Palestinian-American columnist, stand-up comedian and radio talk show host Ray Hanania has penned a remarkable humor column for the Jerusalem Post.

I am formally announcing my candidacy to run for president of Palestine in the next election on the "quid pro quo" peace party.

I know it could be tough, living here in Chicago, but I figure if I win, I won't have trouble getting a ticket, although it might be rough passing through Israeli security.

Nevertheless, I think what Palestine and Israel need is a candidate who is unequivocal on a vision for peace.
The rest of the column is his platform.

The thing is, the article is not funny. It only sounds that way because the peace process has left us with the belief

Hanania's platform would actually work, if there were actually leaders willing to implement it.
It seems so easy when you write it and read it. I know that the only thing preventing this from happening is fear, intransigence and a reluctance to believe in a better future than the one we have today.
Hanania thinks his vision is shared by a majority of Palestinians. The opinion polls are against him.

Yet, if there is ever to be a two-state solution, it would look a lot like this.

Instead, the very best we get Palestinian Authority Prime Minister Salaam Fayad planning to unilaterally declare statehood and to seek UN recognition.

Fayad says he has begun a two-year development plan meant to lay the groundwork for an independent Palestinian state. He is working to strengthen the Palestinian Authority's institutions and root out corruption so that the PA will get more support.

Too bad he is not doing it because it is the right thing to do.

On Sunday, West Bank officials announced plans to extend the term of PA President Mahmoud Abbas &mdash who prefers to go by his terrorist name, Abu Mazen. This accomnpanied a recommendation to postpone presidential elections indefinitely.

Friday, November 13, 2009

Just Because It Never Worked Before Is No Reason to Try Again

One definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.

Another is this US policy towards the Israel-Palestinian conflict:

Facing a political crisis in the Palestinian Authority, the White House has presented Israel with a list of measures it should take to bolster embattled Palestinian leader Yassir Arafat Mahmoud Abbas.
Abbas &mdash who prefers to go by his terrorist name, Abu Mazen &mdash has announced that he will not run for re-election in January. He may also resign from additional political posts he is currently holding, including the Palestine Liberation Organization's (PLO) Executive Committee and the Fatah Central Committee.

Of course, the Palestinian Authority has also declared that they cannot hold the elections in January, a year late, because Hamas won't play nice in Gaza. This would allow Abu Mazen to indefinitely continue holding the chair to which he has no legal right.

Nevertheless, Abu Mazen's gesture is probably a ploy. He threatens his own resignation and the subsequent collapse of the PA so often, it is only barely newsworthy.

So, why does he do it? Because it gets results. The results may be worthless in any lasting context, but all he cares about is getting results.

He used the same tactic against Arafat, until he actually resigned in 2003. The US brought him back, proving that both parties can be equally stupid when it comes to setting foreign policy with Palestinians.

Usually, though, the White House pressures Israel to make some gestures, removing checkpoints, freeing terrorists, giving money. This leads to a lull in negotiations. Then &mdash when they think Abu Mazen is safe from accusations of tit-for-tat bargaining &mdash Israel makes an offer which the Palestinians refuse. This drags on, violence rises, Palestinians complain, and Abu Mazen threatens to resign.

Here is an example.

On 2 March 2008, Abbas stated he was suspending peace talks with Israel. Four months later, on 20 May 2008, Abbas stated he would resign from his office if the current round of peace talks had not yielded an agreement in principle "within six months". On August 25, Olmert released some 200 prisoners. Shortly thereafter, he made an unbelieveable offer to Abu Mazen who turned it down for no apparent reason.

On 9 January 2009, Abbas's term as president, at least as he was originally elected, ended. Citing Operation Cast Lead, he declared that he could not hold elections, and delayed them for a year. Of course, the fact that his successor should have been inaugurated that day and the fact that no election was even being planned sort of suggests that Operation Cast Lead was an excuse.

The Palestinian elections are scheduled for January 24, 2010. I would not bet a bagel against all the oil in the Middle East that they will happen on time. If they do, I don't care who certifies them, there is no chance of their being free and fair.

And if they are, then Abu Mazen &mdash whose approval rating among Palestinians is somewhat lower than toe fungus &mdash will have no hope of even placing, let alone winning.

But the US keeps trying to "strengthen" the corrupt dictator, usually by forcing Israel to make increasingly dangerous concessions.

So, during Obama and Netanyahu's meeting on 9 November and in other recent exchanges between Washington and Jerusalem, the US has "put forward three fields" in which Israeli concessions could help Abu Mazen show progress results and regain popular support, with the aim of ultimately convincing him to reconsider his decision not to run again for office:
  • Early implementation of the agreement on settlement moratorium
  • Lifting roadblocks and barriers in the West Bank
  • Release from Israeli jails of prisoners affiliated with Fatah
After all, just because it never worked before is no reason not to try again, right?

Wrong.

If Israel announced that, due to Abu Mazen's personal charm and charisma, it was officially disbanding and givein all of Israel to the Palestinians, Abu Mazen still could not win a Palestinian election. If the Hidden Imam appeared riding Muhammed's horse and said, "That's my boy!" Palestinians would not elect Abu Mazen.

And if they did, what good would it do? Abu Mazen has accomplished exactly nothing on the road to peace and prosperity for Palestinians, Israelis, or the rest of the world.

Supporting him has to be insanity. Nothing else explains it.

Tuesday, November 10, 2009

Turkey Denies Another Genocide

Still think Turkey is a Democratic ally in the Muslim world?

We got some surprised remarks when we started talking about a change in Turkey.

We were not exaggerating.

Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan defended his decision to invite Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir to Istanbul for an Organization of the Islamic Conference summit, AP reported, he said he has no problem with the fact that Bashir is wanted by the International Criminal Court for mass murder in Darfur, because the accusation is clearly false.

It is not possible for those who belong to the Muslim faith to carry out genocide.
Oh, really. What do a million dead Armenians have to say? *

Apparently, the Prime Minister of Israel's closest Muslim ally believes it not only is possible for those who belong to the Jewish faith to carry out genocide, but inevitable.

Erdogan accused Israel of committing much greater crimes versus Palestinians during Israel's Operation Cast Lead &mdash a three-week military conflict in which just over a thousand Palestinians were killed, of whom 709 were known Hamas or Islamic Jihad terrorists &mdash than Sudan did in Darfur &mdash a systematic six-year spree of rape and murder in which the Sudanese government admits a death toll of roughly 19,500 civilians, with outside observers claiming over 400,000, plus countless other atrocities, abductions, and slavery.

Adding insult to injury, Erdogan said it would be easier to discuss state killings of civilians with al-Bashir than with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

"I cannot discuss this with Netanyahu but I can easily discuss such issues with Omar al-Bashir. I can say to his face: What you are doing is wrong," Erdogan said, simultaneously proving himself a liar.

I do not have time to comment on this in detail, so I will refer you to Evelyn Gordon.



* Obviously, the victims of the Armenian Genocide say nothing. Much like US President Barack Obama, who does not seem willing to accuse those who belong to the Muslim faith of murder, either.

Sunday, November 08, 2009

The Diversity of Jihad

Army Chief of Staff Gen. George Casey Jr.'s chief concern in the wake of the Fort Hood attack seems to be not protecting American soldiers from death at the hands of a jihadist in their midst, but preventing a "backlash" against "diversity".

Consider his comments on the Sunday morning talk shows, whether on CBS, NBC, ABC, or CNN, where he told interviewer John King on State of the Union: "This was a kick in the gut." Yet his main concern is not justice but political correctness.

He dismisses the fact that the Army completely missed all the warnings in the case of fanatic Islamist and self-described Palestinian as well as Virginia-born U.S. Army psychiatrist Major Nidal Malik Hasan. He spent no time arguing that the Army needs to do more, instead worrying that Americans might "jump to conclusions now based on little snippets of information that come out."

And frankly, I am worried -- not worried, but I'm concerned that this increased speculation could cause a backlash against some of our Muslim soldiers. And I've asked our Army leaders to be on the lookout for that. It would be a shame -- as great a tragedy as this was, it would be a shame if our diversity became a casualty as well.
This theme Gen. Casey echoed in all of his interviews.

It is safe to assume that Hasan saw his planned massacre as a religious act. It is unsafe to assume otherwise. It is this same politically correct tripe that allowed Hasan to fire more than 100 rounds of ammunition into his fellow Americans, despite numerous indications that there was a problem, despite an ongoing investigation into Internet postings all pointing to a religiously inspired hostility toward America's military operations and his fellow troops.

The failure of command is that no one removed Hasan from his position. Gen. Casey's Army was afraid to appear to be discriminating against a Muslim.

In fact, despite being so odd that he could not fulfill his duties to see patients, no one demanded a full psychiatric evaluation of Hasan.

Hasan yelled "Allahu Akbar" — Arabic for "Allah is Greater" — just before opening fire. It is safe to assume that he saw his planned massacre as a religious act. It is unsafe to assume otherwise.

There are about 3,000 Muslims on active Guard and reserve duty. No one in authority, not even Gen. Casey, believes there is significant discrimination against them, now.

Unfortunately, there was reverse discrimination. His fellow students complained to the faculty at the military's Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences about Hasan's "anti-American propaganda," but said a fear of appearing discriminatory against a Muslim student kept officers from filing a formal written complaint.

Americans are not easily consumed with hatred. Even after September 11, 2001, the citizens of the US did not rise up in hatred and call for the wiping out of all Muslims or even a war on religion. In fact, Americans reached out to Muslims and tried to learn about and show acceptance of their religion.

Of course, there are always outliers. I have no doubt, having known soldiers, that there may have been taunts, teasing, and outright racism. Probably in about the same proportion as in society at large, or possibly less, due to the Army's efforts to stamp out anything which threatens multiculturalism.

Racism is not yet dead, but Muslims in America are not the most highly targeted religion.

According to FBI statistics, Jews are nearly eight times as likely to be victims of religiously motivated hate crimes as Muslims are. In 2007, the last year for which figures are available, 133 such crimes were reported against Muslims, compared with 1,010 against Jews.

But Americans have been taught and the majority believe that coexistence is the ideal. Our schools teach it, our newspapers teach it, our entertainments teach it, even our churches and synagogues teach it.

Islam teaches the opposite.

Here are some quotes from the Qur'an which make this clear:
  • Fighting is obligatory for you, much as you dislike it. (Surah 2:216)
  • Believers, do not make friends with any but your own people... They desire nothing but your ruin... You believe in the entire Book.(Surah 3:118)
  • Seek out your enemies relentlessly. (Surah 4:103-)
  • Believers, take neither Jews nor Christians for your friends. (Surah 5:51)
  • Make war on them until idolatry shall cease and Allah's religion shall reign supreme. (Surah 8:36)
  • ...make war on the leaders of unbelief... Make war on them: Allah will chastise them at your hands and humble them. He will grant you victory over them... (Surah 9:12)
  • If you do not fight, He will punish you sternly, and replace you by other men. (Surah 9:37)
  • Believers, make war on the infidels who dwell around you. Deal firmly with them. (Surah 9:121)
  • Muhammad is Allah's apostle. Those who follow him are ruthless to the unbelievers but merciful to one another. (Surah 48:29)
Pakistani jihad leader Beitullah Mehsud claims that "Allah on 480 occasions in the Holy Qur'an extols Muslims to wage jihad. We only fulfill Allah's orders. Only jihad can bring peace to the world." He specified that his jihad - struggle in Arabic - was an offensive military operation.

Here is another passage, from Surah 3:119: "When they meet you they say: 'We, too, are believers.' But when alone, they bite their finger-tips with rage."

Honestly, does this sound like Christians, Jews, or Muslims?

In historical context, it might have been Christians or Jews who felt this way. When these words were written down in the years after Mohammed's death, the Christians and Jews that most Muslims were likely to meet were oppressed, second-class citizens.

"Fight against such as those to whom the Scriptures were given," says Surah 9:27, "Until they pay tribute out of hand and are utterly subdued." The utterly subdued might well have shown one face in public and another in private. The alternative was death.

But death is no deterrent to Islam. Humiliation is far worse.

It is the overwrought sense of humiliation which drove Hasan to murder.

Not all Muslims are like this. I doubt the majority of the Army's 3000 Muslims are prepared to turn their weapons on their fellow soldiers, even if they are conflicted about turning them against their fellow Muslims.

Hasan was a Muslim who could not get a date from a mosque dating service. He rejected all the women, imposing too many conditions.

After arriving at Fort Hood, he was conflicted about what to tell fellow Muslim soldiers about the fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan, alarming Osman Danquah, co-founder of the Islamic Community of Greater Killeen, from whom he sought counsel.

"I told him, 'There's something wrong with you,'" Danquah told The Associated Press on Saturday. "I didn't get the feeling he was talking for himself, but something just didn't seem right."

What worries me is that the military does not even know how its Muslims feel. it is afraid to find out for fear of appearing discriminatory. Yet Muslims are not alone, and not all of them are murderers.

Danqua himself is a retired US Army first sergeant and Gulf War veteran. Twice this summer, Hasan asked him what to tell soldiers who expressed misgivings about fighting fellow Muslims. He reminded Hasan that these soldiers had volunteered to fight, and that Muslims were fighting against each other in Afghanistan, Pakistan and the "Palestinian territories."

Do not believe that religious Muslims are not prohibited from killing Muslims. The terrorists in Afghanistan and Iraq have killed far more believers than infidels. This is usually the case.

According to his official PLO biography, Yassir Arafat killed six people. All were Muslims. Most were Palestinians.

This year alone, Palestinian Arabs violently killed 210 of their own — including 9 women and 20 children. This compares to 254 Palestinian Arabs violently killed by each other in 2008, and 618 in 2007.

The so-called Religion of Peace is awfully violent and has been since Muhammed's day.

Denying this is a disservice to the Muslims themselves.

The emotional problems do not stem merely from fighting co-religionists. Hasan's conflict comes from deeper psychological damage. It happens when a US soldier defines himself not as an American, but as a Muslim, first.

Hasan's family came from Jordan, but he was born in Virginia, raised in the US, educated by the military. Yet he described himself as a Palestinian. He identified first with his faith, then with his country.

And he had deep emotional scars which were visible to classmates, friends, people at his mosque, family members, casual acquaintances, and even the FBI. Yet the self-imposed blindness of those concerned more about diversity than safety doomed Hasan and his victims.

"Ultimately it was Brother Nidal's doing, but the command should be held accountable," said Victor Benjamin II, 30, another former member of the Army who had befriended Hasan at the mosque. "G.I.'s are like any equipment in the Army. When it breaks, those who were in charge of keeping it fit should be held responsible for it."

And pretending that his religion exempts a G.I. from fundamental fitness checks is worse than stupid: it is dangerous.

On Thursday, the toll of political correctness added 13 dead and 38 wounded. At least 17 victims remained hospitalized with gunshot wounds, and nine were in intensive care late Saturday.

Gen. Casey's concern that political correctness be preserved will ensure that the toll grows.

For more on the nature of Islam, check out this reading list.

Thursday, November 05, 2009

Picture vs. Caption

Here is a picture by Jonathan Nackstrand for AFP/Getty Images (click for larger image, or here for source):

Here is the caption:

A masked Palestinian youth set a tire on fire during clashes with Israeli police in Jerusalem's old city Sunday. Dozens of people were wounded in confrontations between Israeli police and Palestinians at the Al-Aqsa mosque compound, a site holy to Muslims and Jews alike.
Here is the problem.

Reading the caption you might believe one of the following:
  • While clashing with Israeli police in Jerusalem's old city, this masked Palestinian youth set a tire on fire.
  • As part of confrontations between Israeli police and Palestinians at the Al-Aqsa mosque compound, this masked Palestinian youth set a tire on fire.
  • This masked Palestinian youth setting a tire on fire clashed with Israeli police in Jerusalem's old city Sunday.
  • This masked Palestinian youth setting a tire on fire had something to do with clashed with confrontations between Israeli police and Palestinians at the Al-Aqsa mosque compound in Jerusalem's old city, on Sunday, when dozens of people were wounded.
Please note, the caption does not precisely say any of these things. The picture rather defies them.

Burning tires is nasty. It makes a lot of nasty smoke. It is also difficult to start. You cannot just hold a lighter to the spare from your trunk and run.

Look carefully at the picture. Note the pile of ash and burned papers. This looks like a burn pit. This is not a spontaneous demonstration.

Note also that the tire is still on a wheel. This is not some random piece of garbage the plucky insurgent improvised into a weapon.

Keep looking at the picture. See if you can spot anything else. Look carefully.

Do you see the person chatting on a cell phone with a pack of cigarettes? Look in the smoke behind our Palestinian pyromaniac. Farther back you can see the outline of a crowd standing at the end of an alley. Note the lack of upraised fists, running, or other signs of confrontation.

In Pallywood, all the heroes are Palestinian, all the victims are photogenic, and all the Israelis are off-camera. Notice what you cannot see: Israeli police of any kind, or any other protestors.

This boy is not near the Temple Mount in the Old City of Jerusalem. I suspect he is much farther away in an East Jerusalem neighborhood where Jonathan Nackstrand could safely get a shot.

This Palestinian Shirt-Ninja is not participating in any kind of clash with Israeli police. Instead, he is a propaganda piece in the media war.

This is yet another example of staging a protest for better pictures.

Nackstrand may not even be thinking about propaganda. More than likely, he is thinking about the journalist who was stoned by Palestinians when he was caught up in a real protest on the Temple Mount. This makes a much better picture, and is much safer.

Israeli police fired stun grenades at youths who threw rocks at them in teh very real clashes on Sunday. No photojournalist would want to be too close to that.

A Palestinian extinguished a fire after youths threw a gas bomb during clashes with Israeli police in Jerusalem Sunday. Israeli police fired stun grenades at youths who threw rocks at them in the compound of al Aqsa mosque. (Yannis Behrakis/Reuters)Here is a picture of a Palestinian extinguishing a fire after youths threw a gas bomb during clashes with Israeli police in Jerusalem Sunday (Yannis Behrakis/Reuters).

Notice (besides the very real, very large fire) the stone walls found in the Old City, but not in the picture above.

Look at this picture of a protest in Peru. Note how the protestors are right up against the police, trying to get as close as they can to show their displeasure.

But maybe the camera just is not catching the action? Maybe it's all there, just out of frame?

In that case, anywhere but Pallywood, you would get something like this:
A Kashmiri Muslim watched police and protesters, unseen, clash in Srinagar, India, Monday. The protest follows an incident Saturday in which Indian army soldiers shot and killed 25-year-old Sajad Ahmed, a Kashmiri man accused of forcing his way into an army camp. (Mukhtar Khan/Associated Press)


But in Pallywood, all the heroes are Palestinian, all the victims are photogenic, and all the Israelis are off-camera.

Wednesday, November 04, 2009

Israel Navy intercepts weapons smuggling ship

The Israel Navy intercepted a weapons smuggling ship apparently on route from Iran to Hizbullah.

After the Navy conducted an initial check, they uncovered various types of ammunition and arms on board which was disguised as civilian cargo.

The vessel was operating under the flag of Antigua and was rigged to appear as if it was carrying civilian goods as it passed through the Suez Canal and was heading north. It was about 100 miles off the Israeli coast when the Navy boarded it as part of the country's routine activity to maintain security and prevent arms smuggling.

The IDF is expected to release more details on the ship, the cargo and the crew later on Wednesday.

UPDATE: The is not the first time.